was america built on limited-fortunes capitalism & destroyed by unlimited-fortunes capitalism?

October 6th, 2009
Posted by: admin

naturally, in the beginning of usa, there was not any super-overwealth - plus the founding fathers wisely prohibited entail & primogeniture inheritance, & fixed clergy salaries, to prevent the unjust wealth concentration that had made european tyranny & abuse of human rights

altho jefferson & lincoln warned against the corporation, [which never dies & so could get round their inheritance provisions to prevent unjust wealth & power concentration] the american rulers [the people] failed to prevent unjust wealth & power concentration [robber barons, corporations, multinationals, tammany hall politics, strangulation of govt by oilmafia etc] - & now america has the usual symptoms of tyranny: corruption, monopolism, fascism, oppression, economic breakdown
[eg, 7 of top 10 banks gone to japan, japan & others taken over electronics & car industries, big business interference with freemarket, competition & govt, galloping debt [to japan & others], tokyo worth as much as usa + europe, etc]

By: nigelbestpeace



Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 at 21:55 and is filed under corporation bank. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “was america built on limited-fortunes capitalism & destroyed by unlimited-fortunes capitalism?”

  1. normobrian Says:

    First of all, America has never had any restrictions on the accumulation of capital, besides taxes, that is. America was built on the free market economy model. A man can rise as far as his ambitions and talents can take him. It originally espoused the idea of ’survival of the fittest’; the government did not support or assist the poor, the old, or the infirm.

    Secondly, America is not yet destroyed, although your point is well founded. Corporations now WRITE the laws. Congressmen who sell their offices want the buyers to write the legislation, too.

    Thirdly, there is no such thing as ‘unjust wealth’, except that which is stolen. Bill Gates has justly accumulated every penny he has. More power to him. If I support limiting his ability to accumulate wealth, I am doing the same to myself. At least I have something to work for if I know that I can keep the money I earn. The alternative is socialism.

Leave a Reply